1. The proposal was forwarded by the East DMC (online) for consideration of the Commission.
2. The Commission did not approve the layout and building plan proposal at its meeting held on November 13, 2020 specific observations were given.
3. The layout and building plan proposal (for group housing) received (online) at formal stage was scrutinised along with the replies submitted by the architect in compliance to the earlier observations of the Commission communicated vide DUAC observation letter no: OL-10112056009 dated 19.11.2020. It was observed that observations indicated at sr. no 2 (a, b, d, e, f, g, j, k, l and m) inadequate compliance for this has been given, needs to be resubmitted after necessary compliances. However, based on the revised scheme submitted for the consideration of the Commission following observations were given:
a) It was observed that location and building profile of the community centre, ESS etc. has been indicated in the layout plan but their detailed drawings (elevations, sections, 3D views etc.) have been not submitted. The Commission observed that it has a bearing on the overall visual, urban and aesthetic quality of the complex, accordingly, submission shall be revised and resubmitted.
b) Inconsistency between 3D views and site plan/layout plan etc. submitted was observed, thereby not presenting the correct picture of the proposal. All drawings etc. shall ensure to be better coordinated with each other and resubmitted for the review of the Commission.
c) The Commission observed that given the sizeable size of the plot, it appears to have spread the housing component and surface parking profligately and perhaps not judiciously, without considering potential future evolution and requirements. This design approach might alter and mar the aesthetics of the area by creating avoidable limitations.
d) Alternative options may be explored for accommodating surface parking elsewhere including basement, and the freed up parking spaces may be used judiciously. Considering these facts, it was strongly suggested to prepare a comprehensive master plan for the site incorporated with all the current and futuristic requirements and submitted.
e) It was observed that all residential towers are of similar height. To break the monotony, it was suggested to provide some variation as program requires to enhance the overall visual, urban and aesthetic experience.
f) The building block profile has been designed in a manner creating a lot of negative spaces. It shall be redesigned to minimise negative/wastage of space.
g) The building blocks seems to have been placed arbitrarily, without optimising and considering the weather conditions in the City of Delhi. Further, direct light and ventilation to the rooms shall be ensured.
h) Internal functional furniture arrangements of the typical residential units shall be provided for better understanding of the functioning of the individual units.
i) As per project report, a lot of trees on the site are proposed to be cut and replanted for the project. Considering environmental considerations, it was requested to provide a detailed survey indicating the details of the trees to be cut/planted, existing trees, levels, types of species on an appropriate scale (in terms of the point nos. Six of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval) available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org.
j) The complex should aim to maximise energy efficiency with the appropriate use of the solar panels on building roof tops etc. and screen them by using appropriate architectural mechanisms and set an example in the city for such future proposals. Sustainability features shall be as per point no. 7 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval) available on the DUAC website at www.duac.org .
k) All service equipment at the terrace should be camouflaged appropriately (in terms of the point nos. 10, 11 &12 of the CPAA (Criterion for Project Assessment and Approval) available on DUAC website at www.duac.org.
4. The architect is advised to adhere to all the above observations given by the Commission and furnish a point wise incorporation/reply.